Login

19 Sep 2019

The 1959 D "Wheat Ears Reverse" Mule

Odd & Curious Money | JudeA

A "mule" error, as it is called, is when a obverse or reverse has a design that is not typically seen on the coin. A famous example is the 2000 Sacagawea and Quarter. It had a Sacagawea Dollar planchet and reverse struck on an obverse of a state quarter, and sold for a record price of $192,000!Mule coins are generally VERY rare, and attract a lot of attention when one is found. They have a very low chance of being produced, because it is unlikely a mint official will overlook something like that. There are only a few mule coins certified by a leading grading service. Keep in mind that minor, or 4th party grading services might certify fake coins due to lack of knowledge or as an attempt to gain publicity. The most famous example of a cent mule error is arguably the 1959 D with a wheat ears reverse. As you all know, the cent's reverse was changed in 1959 to the memorial style reverse. Somehow, a old die must have gotten mixed in and struck this piece. This piece is still a matter of discussion as to whether it is a mint product. It was discovered in change in 1986 by Leon Baller. He sent it in to the US treasury in 1987 for authentication. The letter he received stated that they had examined his coin, and that their opinion was that his coin was a genuine mint product. Despite this, NGC, PCGS, and ANACS all sent the coin back to him with a, no decision grade, unslabbed. J.P. Martin from IGC stated that, "He had no evidence to prove that the coin is fake, but his gut instinct told him that it was not a genuine mint product." PCGS founder David Hall also said that he thought it was fake. It does seem odd that there is only 1 of these coins produced. If a die had struck the coin, there probably would be more examples by now, 110 years after this piece was "minted." It was put up for auction in 2003 by Goldberg auctions. They graded it MS(60), but no major service had chosen to certify it. It was pulled from the auction when forager Mark Hofmann confessed to making the coin. It was put back for auction and sold for $48,300. It sold again in 2010 for $27,000. It was sold again in 2019, in September, and sold for $50,000, which was exactly the estimate. This coin is widely discussed in forums mostly anywhere, and is widely known. My opinion is that, this piece is a mint product, and was just struck by a mint official who wanted to make something interesting in his free time. Many people, however, think that it is fake. The general opinion is that this piece is fake, although if another example surfaced, it might change the opinions of many people. I hope you enjoyed this blog! My question for this blog is - Do you think that the 1959 D mule cent is genuine or fake? Happy hunting!

READ MORE

Money.org Blog and Forum Terms & Conditions of Use / Disclaimer

This is a community-sourced blog. Any views or opinions represented in this blog are personal and belong solely to the blog post’s author, and do not represent the views or opinions of the American Numismatic Association, and may not represent the views or opinions of people, institutions or organizations that the author may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity.

All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The American Numismatic Association (ANA) makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The ANA does not monitor the blog on a constant basis.

The ANA will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information, nor for the availability of this information. The ANA will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Downloadable Files and Images

Any downloadable file, including but not limited to pdfs, docs, jpegs, pngs, is provided at the user’s own risk. The ANA will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages resulting from a corrupted or damaged file.

Blog/Forum Posts and Comments

In these terms and conditions, “user content” means material including without limitation text, images, audio material, video material, and audio-visual material that you submit to this website, for whatever purpose.

Blog/forum posts and comments are encouraged. However, the ANA reserves the right to edit or delete any blog/forum posts or comments without notice. User content deemed to fall under the following categories will be removed and may prompt disciplinary actions, including, but not limited to, review and suspension/revocation of blog and forum privileges:

  • User content deemed to be spam or questionable spam.
  • User content intended for commercial purposes or to buy, sell or trade items.
  • User content containing profanity.
  • User content containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive.
  • User content containing hate speech, credible threats, or direct attacks on an individual or group.

In addition, user content shall not be illegal or unlawful, shall not infringe any third party’s legal rights, and shall not be capable of giving rise to legal action whether against you, the ANA, or a third party under any applicable law.

The ANA may terminate your access to all or any part of the website at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, effective immediately. If you wish to terminate this Agreement or your Money.org account (if you have one), you may simply discontinue using the website. All provisions of this Agreement which by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity and limitations of liability.

The ANA reserves the right to display advertisements on your account and blog pages.

This blog’s terms & conditions of use / disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

We use cookies to provide users the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your cookie settings, we'll assume that you agree to receive all cookies on money.org. You may disable cookies at any time using your internet browser configuration. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use. To learn more about how we use cookies and to review our privacy policy, click here.